Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Toclafane Invasion
This article contains spoilers for Torchwood: Children of Earth, especially days 4 and 5. If you haven't watched these yet or aren't already aware of the widely discussed spoiler, don't read on...

Also please note that I personally identify as queer and use the term to mean any sexual or gender identity outside of cisgender, vanilla heterosexuality. If you find this term offensive, please substitute the word with 'LGBT' as you read.


The recent Torchwood miniseries, Children of Earth had a climatic ending involving the death of Ianto Jones and the departure of Captain Jack Harkness from the planet. Before this point, Ianto and Jack were in a relationship that had developed through series 2 and the Radio 4 Torchwood afternoon plays.

With the death of one member of a prominent same sex relationship, some fans and observers have accused the storyline, and by extension the writers, of being homophobic.

Personally, I don't believe that openly gay lead writer Russell T Davies is homophobic, even subconciously. However, given the history of popular culture representations of LGBT characters and relationships in mainstream TV drama, I can see how Children of Earth could look homophobic or at least heterosexist or heteronormative, especially when viewed on its own without the context of the previous Torchwood series.

Heteronormatism

Heterosexuality is the default in fiction, so if someone is queer, they're queer for a plot reason. It could be argued that this leads to the tendency to need to write out the queer character when the plotline that made them queer ends.

Does Torchwood suffer from this?

  • No, Jack is a long term, leading character who happens to be queer – Jack actually comes from a time without heteronormativity and set this as the primary attitute within the Torchwood Hub in series one and two
  • No, Ianto/Jack is an on going plot thread that doesn't serve any purpose but character development (in series 2)
  • No, in series 1 and 2 having same sex attraction or romance is shown as normal and not something for characters to angst about (more on series 3 later)
  • Yes, our viewpoint character is Gwen, who is heterosexual and in a long term monogamous relationship. RTD has even gone as far as to describe Gwen as 'the heart and emotion' and 'the humanity' in Torchwood
  • Yes, Rhys, Gwen's partner is bought back when killed in series one and both Gwen and Rhys survive CoE

From Straight to Gay (with Nothing In Between)

As an extension of Heteronormatism, most long term characters start off straight by default and are given a gay storyline later on. This means queer stories on TV are almost always about previously assumed straight or straight by behaviour characters discovering they have feelings for a same sex character and then struggling to accept themself as queer. This almost always means that our viewpoint character's doubt and internalised homophobia are played out, as is the often quite justified doubt of other characters, often without the counter argument that a more self-confident character would supply.

We also get some biphobia here – it's almost unheard of for a character who previously had heterosexual partners on screen to ever use the word 'bisexual'. They'll either say they're only attracted to this one person or they'll identify completely as gay. Cf. Buffy:TVS's Willow who after having a long term crush on Xander, a loving relationship with Oz and a clearly bisexual parallel universe counterpart, but when asked about the part relationship with Oz after meeting Tara says: 'Gay now'.

Does Torchwood suffer from this?

  • No, Jack couldn't be more comfortable about being 'gender blind' in terms of relationships
  • Yes, Ianto in Children of Earth is repeatedly seen as being uncomfortable about being seen as gay
  • Yes, Ianto says it's just Jack and no one else, doesn't say bisexual
  • Yes, Ianto doesn't complain about or respond in kind to casual homophobic jokes by relatives

Nothing at the end of the Street / The Only Gay In The Village

This is especially a problem in soap operas (the British gritty kind) where everything happens in a bubble – nothing goes on outside the street or the square, everyone interacts only with other characters in the soap and only does so in locations that exist in the soap world. If a queer character arrives in Albert Square or Coronation Street, they can't just head of to the vibrant London or Manchester gay scenes, they're stuck in The Queen Vic or The Rover's Return. So the only logical thing to do with a newly arrived LGB character is to 'turn' one of the pre-existing straight by default characters queer – preferably in the most dramatic way possible (ie, 'turning' a married character or a character who's just got their girlfriend pregnant).

Does Torchwood suffer from this?

Now, part of Torchwood's core plot concept is that being part of Torchwood puts you apart from the rest of the world, so the team inherently becomes incestuous and stuck in a bubble. This happens to Gwen with Owen before it happens to Ianto. However:

  • Yes, Jack, who is previously seen as wanting to seduce everyone he meets is now seen only having a relationship with Ianto – only Gwen has a stable relationship outside the team
  • Yes, Ianto's relationship after Lisa dies is with Jack, another team member (who killed Lisa, but that's a different story)
  • Mixed, part of the concept of Children of Earth is what happens when the protective bubble of the Hub is stripped away leaving the time exposed, as such Ianto starts to experience homophobic attitudes from the outside world when in the previous series it was never seen as a negative thing, rather viewed as completely normal – this isn't necessarily a bad thing but if you view Children of Earth alone, there's almost no positive side to the relationship for Ianto, Jack doesn't even say 'I love you'

Too Queer To Live / Fridging The Queer / The Tragic Queer

Once writers are finished with a queer storyline, usually about an established character struggling to accept their sexuality, the writers often don't wish to continue to maintain the same sex relationship that no longer has a 'plot justification'. The logical progression is to move on to character angst from death (killing a lover to motivate a character into revenge is known as 'fridging'). If the couple had a child, a nasty custody battle with the dead partner's homophobic family will often follow (See Carrie Weaver in ER). The number of same sex relationships in TV drama that end in death is extremely significant, to the point when one has to wonder if writers are aware that same sex relationships can break up for the same mundane everyday reasons as heterosexual couplings...

Historically when 1950's and 1960's films started to deal with The Homosexual Question, they would sympathetically show how the poor queer couldn't help having their terrible affliction, allow them to be a positive character and get to express their point of view and see some hope on the horizon, but then kill them off because society wasn't ready for them yet. The 1990s documentary film The Celluloid Closet devotes a third of the film to this subject and includes a montage of dozens of examples, the most memorable of these is the effeminate character Plato in Rebel Without A Cause who idolises James Dean's character and has parents who 'don't understand', but ultimately dies to motivate the other characters and their parents into reconciliation. Interestingly, this was still happening with transgender characters in the late 1990's, see the death of cross dresser Angel in RENT and the trans character (also played by Wilson Cruz) in Ally McBeal.

Does Torchwood suffer from this?

  • Yes, if you view Children of Earth on its own, Ianto's story certainly looks like The Tragic Queer.
  • Yes, Ianto's death does look suspiciously like it's in the storyline entirely to cause Jack angst for plot reasons.

The Magical Queer / The Depraved Homosexual / Gay Panic

Before The Tragic Queer began to appear, recognisably LGBT characters on film were often mystically wise asexual characters who don't get to be fully developed characters, but only exist to be wise and give the other characters advice. Otherwise they were the depraved villain who wants to corrupt our innocent heroes.

Interestingly, even gay literature can fall into these classic tropes with transgender characters (see Mrs Madrigal, a Magical Queer in Tales of the City).

Does Torchwood suffer from this?

  • No, Jack and Ianto are three dimensional, well developed characters.
  • Yes, In Greeks Baring Gifts, Mary arrives to corrupt poor innocent Tosh into betraying the team through the temptation of lesbian sex – looks like a classic Gay Panic story, has no plot reason other than to make Tosh look less perfect and we never see this side of Tosh again – arguably this is the closest to being 'homophobic' that Torchwood ever gets!

Hurt/Comfort – The Masochist Hero

Hurt/Comfort is a common trope of slash fiction that sees one part of a same sex couple experience some horrible event so that the other half of the couple can comfort them. It's a short cut to getting stoic male characters to open up their emotional side and let down their guard to human contact.

This is arguably homophobic as it tends to be used to get otherwise straight masculine characters to behave in feminine ways (or possibly just wildly out of character). It's certainly heteronormative as it assumes that men can't express feelings and show love for each other without suffering great loss or pain first.

Some fic authors and some characters tend to attract more angst than others. Some particular characters move past the comfort part and just seem to experience endless hurt and angst that they can then stoically suffer through, possibly forgiving everyone involved afterwards. Avon from Blake's 7 is a classic example of a character who tends to be endlessly tortured in slash, and even in Paul Darrow's own book and script!

Does Torchwood suffer from this?

  • Yes, hurt/comfort is arguably the first step in the Ianto/Jack relationship
  • Yes, Jack dies for the sins of the Torchwood team at the end of series 1, arises from the dead after three days then forgives them because they knew not what they did.
  • Yes, Jack is ludicrously tortured by the Gray (and so the Torchwood writers) with more and more pain and angst heaped upon the character to the point where series 2 should really end with Jack being irreculably damaged and completely insane (but instead ends with forgiving everyone involved again)
  • Yes, Ianto's death seems to happen simply to give Jack an angst ridden reason to lose hope and give up (and to give the character no reason to stay around at the end of the story)
Is this homophobic? No necessarily, but it's not treating the characters with respect, more like objects of emotional pornography! In fact, one of my friends described the last two episodes of Children of Earth as 'the writers jizzing in the face of the viewers'.

The Bottom Line

Overall, I don't think Torchwood Children of Earth was homophobic, as it's written by an openly gay man and its lead actor is an openly gay man. I don't buy arguments that the story is evidence of RTD's self hatred. The previous series were refreshing in their general attitude that being queer is a normal every day part of human existence.

Unfortunately, and especially when viewed on its own, Children of Earth looks a lot like the same hereonormative, homophobic, biphobic and gratuitous tropes that appear in so many bad representations of queer people in popular culture.

In a cultural context where there are so few positive representations of queer life around, and where almost all of those eventually end in separation, character death or angst, do queer writers have an obligation to take this into account when writing characters out of a series, for whatever reason?

And if a character hasn't yet come to terms with their sexuality and experiences homophobic or heterosexist attitudes from the world around them, do writers have a responsibility to give the opposing view from a happier and more self accepting queer character?

If you enjoyed this article, I've also been involved in a podcast panel discussing the same topic, now available on the Radio Free Skaro blog.

Comments

( 10 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]flippac wrote:
Jul. 15th, 2009 03:29 pm (UTC)
Seems to me that (and someone's probably got there already) there's a more general critique to be had about how Torchwood handles the Other, othering and isolation. It's hard to show consequences playing out at the same time as showing how to avoid them, of course. S2 perhaps tried that a bit, but using 'got there too late' as a way to avoid everything neatening out does run the risk of accidentally saying "can't be done".
[info]roadriverrail wrote:
Jul. 15th, 2009 07:47 pm (UTC)
Being broadly unfond of the majority of science fiction television available these days, I don't have a great deal of context for Torchwood itself, but this serves as an interesting primer for analyzing heterosexist attitudes in television in general. It's even made me wonder about whether or not certain things I've seen lately qualify under the tropes you list.

For my dollar, some of the best television writing of queer characters lately has been in The Wire. I'm only 2 seasons in, so maybe it takes a nosedive, but I suspect it won't. One of the police officers is in a lesbian relationship and this is depicted almost completely as mere "natural domestic life" for her, no different than the treatment of the domestic lives of the other cops.

Even more interesting, though, is a character named Omar, who makes his money robbing the supply houses of Baltimore's drug cartels, and who is openly gay. Generally speaking, there hasn't (as far as I know) been a need to "feminize" him as mentioned above, but reading through this list of tropes has made me wonder. There is a plot arc where one of the cartels tortures and kills his lover (and fellow gunman) in retribution for their raids and in the hopes that it will lead Omar to make rash decisions and expose himself to be killed. It's interesting to wonder, however, if it's a case of "fridging" or not, since it was itself retribution and Omar continues as a casually-written gay character after this.
[info]kathie_d wrote:
Jul. 15th, 2009 09:14 pm (UTC)
Very interesting article! Voice is now quite sore from reading the whole thing out-loud to the husband. *croak*

I can't say I really thought about whether or not Torchwood was homophobic whilst I was watching it, although it did kind of annoy me when Ianto said he wasn't attracted to men, just Jack. At first I thought that was a bit silly - but then I wondered if he was trying to come out in stages. Like first admitting that he liked Jack, then later going on to say 'well OK then, I'm bi'.

(yes dammit, you are right! So many characters are straight or gay, not bi!)

The fact that he didn't respond to casual homophobic comments from his family didn't bother me - I don't bother if someone I know loves me says a random comment to me - but if someone in my family says something actually quite seriously like 'being gay is evil' (cheers parents), then I will actually respond. I think his brother-in-law saying 'Alright gay boy?' or whatever was the former, not the latter.

Anyway, cheers for an interesting read.
[info]yoyoangel wrote:
Jul. 16th, 2009 08:48 am (UTC)
Great article; thank you. Untangles some of what I'd been thinking about CoE.
[info]alba17 wrote:
Jul. 16th, 2009 06:06 pm (UTC)
Very interesting essay. I've listened to about half of the podcast and came across this in your comment to the podcast download link. I'll probably post the link to this in my LJ. There's an awful lot of hysteria around this point in TW fandom right now and your reasoned critique is a good antidote. I was tending to agree with the fridging viewpoint, as I didn't think it was necessary to kill off Ianto for Jack to either 1) sacrifice his grandson, or 2) run away at the end. I was surprised you picked Jack as the TW character who is most hurt. In fan fic, it's Ianto who's much more likely to be hurt and need comfort from Jack. Although in COE, Jack was totally destroyed.

I also don't think RTD is a self-hating queer who's privileging straight relationships by letting Gwen survive with her marriage intact and a baby on the way. He would have killed off Jack's lover regardless of sex. Haven't decided entirely, but I tend to think the random homophobic remarks in COE were showing what you described, Ianto out of his comfort zone of the TW/Hub bubble and what people in a gay relationship might have to deal with in the outside world. Not sure about PC Andy's remark near the end though.
[info]36 wrote:
Jul. 19th, 2009 12:25 am (UTC)
I agree Ianto is the hurt/comfort target more often in fic, but in terms of on screen Torchwood the writers outright torture Jack in every season finale, with messianic overtones if at all possible...
[info]kateorman wrote:
Jul. 17th, 2009 04:34 am (UTC)
... did I just read a reasonable, evidence-based posting about minority representation in a TV series, which considers both the positive and the negative, and is neither snarky nor holier-than-thou?

... no way, must have hallucinated it.

Kudos! :D
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jul. 17th, 2009 03:13 pm (UTC)
"Unfortunately, and especially when viewed on its own, Children of Earth looks a lot like the same hereonormative, homophobic, biphobic and gratuitous tropes that appear in so many bad representations of queer people in popular culture.

In a cultural context where there are so few positive representations of queer life around, and where almost all of those eventually end in separation, character death or angst, do queer writers have an obligation to take this into account when writing characters out of a series, for whatever reason?"


Thank you for presenting a multisided response. I found your essay interesting and informative.

My problem with the way Ianto was treated really has to do with the first of the two paragraphs above. Children of Earth was written to appeal to a wider BBC1 audience, and this is why I do wonder if the way Ianto's and Jack's relationship was protrayed in CoE, including the gay slurs, keeping them apart physically after Day One until Ianto dies, the jokes at Ianto's express after he dies, and the final scene of the heteronormative couple walking away arms around each other to the comfort of their home and the expectations of their baby, if all this was not to downplay the queer relationship for the new viewers.

If I looked at this from the point of view of someone watching TW for the first time, I would receive the same old tired message at the end that bi/gay has to die. And really, as a plot point, wouldn't seeing millions of children being torn from their families knowing he opened the door for this in 1965 by his acquiesance be enough to make Jack sacrifice Stephen without Ianto's death?

Thank you again for a well written essay. It gave me a lot to think about.
[info]36 wrote:
Jul. 19th, 2009 12:35 am (UTC)
The toning queerness down argument was something we had on our show notes to discuss but didn't get around to. My perspective was that Day One shows the relationship clearly, the death is actually a really core part of the story and Ianto's sexuality keeps getting bought up, so I think most new viewers would think it was a very 'gay focused' drama. Also BBC One has pre-watershed same sex couples in Eastenders and has even included gay characters in Doctor Who...

If series 4 turns out to be all straight characters, I'll think again though!
[info]keristor wrote:
Aug. 17th, 2009 10:54 am (UTC)
Apologies for the late comment, I've only just realised who you are on LJ (or who you are IRL, depending on point of view)!

A fascinating article, one which needs rereading. I (straight male) had noticed some of the things you mention (in particular Ianto identifying as "with Jack" rather than as gay or bi, and the oddity of the Tosh/Mary one-off) but not all of them, and it explains some of the disquiet I felt about CoE (not all of it, there were enough other faults with the miniseries).

One point -- H/C is not only a slash phenomenon (although the first time I heard it identified as such was in slash), it exists a lot in the het 'romance' genre as well, especially in the 'bodiceripper' subgenre (either the girl or the man is hurt, comforted by the other, and as a result falls in love with (or at least is willing to have sex with) the other who they had previously rejected or disliked). For that matter it happens at the end of the first Indiana Jones movie. I even wrote some (het) myself as a teenager (long since lost, fortunately!) before I got to thinking about it and disliking it as a plot device.
( 10 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

December 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow